Sep. 6th, 2010

trouble: Catra & Skeletor from She-Ra & He-Man with Evil: For Cooler Costumes! (catra)
This is something I wrote for FWD that won't be going up for a couple of days:


John Stossel, if your business doesn't accommodate wheelchair users chances are you don't have many customers who are wheelchair users.


(Gentle reader, I cannot believe I just typed that sentence 20 years after the ADA passed into law.)




(There is more than that in the post, I promise.)

Today is Jerry Lewis Hates Cripples Day!. (He really did tell people with disabilities that if they don't want pity they should just stay in their homes. I'm so happy he got a humanitarian award for his work with "the disabled", aren't you?)

I was reminded by this post by Bad Cripple about new ways to create social change about how much I want to do some things on campus, like block the front access to the main admin building and advise people to "find another route" (without a sign), and go around one day and put up signs in front of every inaccessible building with "This building does not allow wheelchair users to enter".


Of course, I also want to write in chalk in front of various buildings in Halifax "Wheelchair Users Not Welcome".


You should now talk me out of this.

trouble: tiny empty square with "Ticky box?", flashing to a checkmark with "Tickybox!" (Ticky!)
So, let's say you've created the Platonic Ideal of Internet Something. You've made the most awesome vid ever, your artwork is so awesome it's making grown Annas weep, you've written the most awesome blog post ever on an important subject, your fic is the best thing since sliced bread and maybe even before... You know, the sort of stuff that people link, comment on, and discuss.

Noting, of course, that every Awesome Thing is going to get negative as well as positive commentary, what do you think about people who just link with 'Go see this, it's awesome' (or even lengthy additional commentary) versus people who comment to say "This was awesome, thank you!". Or do you prefer people to do both? And what about people who think what you've created is awful and you should feel awful? Comment? Link? Both? Neither?

I'm genuinely curious what people think and feel about it in regards to themselves.

Poll #4287 SRS BSN
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 44


Assuming Positive: Linking vs Commenting: Fight!

View Answers

Linking is awesomer than Commenting!
6 (13.6%)

Commenting is better than Linking!
1 (2.3%)

Link AND Comment! Two great tastes that taste great together
34 (77.3%)

I am deep in Not Caring Country and I'm not coming back
3 (6.8%)

Assuming Negative: Linking vs Commenting

View Answers

Linking is better.
10 (23.3%)

Commenting is better.
12 (27.9%)

Link & Comment.
15 (34.9%)

Keep your negative commentary to yourself, thank you.
6 (14.0%)

Obligatory Melle question

View Answers

Maple
9 (22.5%)

Vanilla Bean
16 (40.0%)

Cinnamon Kiss
16 (40.0%)

It's like deja vu all over again....
9 (22.5%)

Other
8 (20.0%)



Turnabout being fair play, I sometimes feel woeful when something I worked really hard on gets very few comments, even if it ends up getting a lot of hits that seem to be from "positive" responses (like a recent post I did that I can see doing the rounds of twitter links, but has garnered all of three comments). And yet, I rarely comment anywhere anymore, I mostly link, and I'm not sure that all spaces are generating discussion so much as they are generating back-patting. I don't know. It's very fraught, isn't it?

In more positive news, school starts soon and I am so excited I could dance. Late night openings at the library!!!!!

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2013 12:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios