Buffy.  "Well behaved women rarely make history."
[I'm still not up to engaging with people in any meaningful way, I'm sorry. It's rather bad form to post things and not be able to really talk to people about them, but some of this stuff is timely. And now, back to being stressed beyond ability to cope.]

First, a reminder that the Wonderful and New Exciting Budget we've been blessed with thinks it's okay to pay women less than men for the same job. Because Canada is post-feminist Utopia, as we all know. Via The Toronto Star:

In this case, the Conservative attack on pay equity – the idea that men and women should be paid equally for work of equal value – provides the most telling example. Bill C-10 would end the right of federal civil servants to take pay equity complaints to the federal human rights commission. Instead, such issues would have to be dealt with as part of the normal bargaining process between union and management.

And in determining whether wage rates for men and women were fair, any arbitrator would have to take "market forces" into account.

The problem with this is twofold. First, as a federal task force wrote five years ago, collective bargaining involves tradeoffs. But a woman's constitutionally protected right to be paid fairly is hardly something that should be traded away for an extra coffee break.

Equally important is the reference to market forces. Toronto lawyer Mary Cornish points out that pay equity was designed specifically to rectify a failure in the market that permitted systemic wage discrimination against women. To turn around and subordinate equity to this same market is to negate the entire exercise.

No wait, there's more. )
Balled up piece of paper, with a growl
Hey, you know what's awesome?

Finding out the Liberals under Ignattief think I'm less of a person than the Liberals under Dion did.

The Bloc amendment [which the Liberals and Conservatives voted against] also included a section to "maintain the right of women to settle pay equity issues in court," which became a hot-button issue during the Conservatives' fiscal fall update as the opposition accused the Tories of attacking women's rights.


Parliment Votes Down Bloc Amendments

The Liberal proposed ammendments apparently consist only of "We get reports on the budget three times this year!"

Yeah, Liberals. Go you. I am very happy you took down the section of your website about Women, because it would be so hypocritical of you to pretend you give a damn.
"No, you don't get it!  If you die in Canada, you die in Real Life!"
Dear Green Party friend,

The financial crisis has created a political stampede to stimulate the economy, and as usual the Conservative government is using a crisis as a cover. It is planning to dismantle Canada's environmental protection legislation. Transport Minister John Baird said recently that the plan to speed up infrastructure spending is being held up by 100-year-old rules. This is the same man who gave us a climate change plan designed to accomplish nothing other than media hits.

He was referring to the Navigable Waters Protection Act, a law that has enabled the federal government to protect lakes and rivers for a century. It, along with the Environmental Assessment Act and the Environmental Protection Act, gives the federal government both the right and the responsibility to preserve Canada's natural heritage. Last Thursday, environmental groups released evidence that the government plans to gut the Environmental Assessment Act.

These environmental laws were written so that the environmental implications of projects are considered before construction begins. They are of fundamental importance to protecting our wildlife, our air, and our water.

Too many times in the past we have ignored the environment in our rush to go faster only to learn, once it was too late, that the environment was at risk.

The Green Party advocates stimulating the green economy to create jobs and secure our children's future, but we cannot let the financial crisis cloud our judgment. We must see it as an opportunity to make the right kinds of decisions, to preserve our environmental protections, and to invest in the green economy.

The budget will come on January 27th, and all the attention will be focused on the billions being spent and the huge deficit. We can't let the Conservative government use the budget and the crisis to cover up the dismantling of Canada's environmental protection legislation.

Please join us in raising the alarm. Voice your concern!

1. Contact the Hon. Jim Prentice, Minister of Environment, to let him know we are watching.
2. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper.
3. Make a donation to help us in our fight against these changes.
Speech balloon with "Waking up this morning was a pointless act of masochism"
One of the "perks" (if one can call it that) of my current job is that I can read the Globe & Mail (Canada's National Newspaper!*) five mornings a week.

Oh, the things the Globe and Mail has taught me over these past five months! The things I have learned.

For example, I have learned that Everything That Happens In Canadian Politics is caused by Elizabeth May from her secret underground (and eco-friendly) lair in New Glasgow.

No, I don't know how the leader of a party that got less than 10% of the popular vote and hasn't had an elected MP yet is causing all this drama in Canada, but the Globe & Mail does! I'm so happy to have them explain it all to me.

Cut for Canadian Politics )
* If by "National" you mean "It happened in Toronto so it's front page news." I'm still a Westerner at heart, and this leaves me bitter.

** Look, see, I'm bitter than a murder in a Toronto suburb gets attention in our National media, and lots of it, but a murder in Halifax and a marked increase in gang violence that closed our Emergency Ward twice has not.

*** I find her delightfully snarky, but I have to admit, if she were on the other side of the political fence, I'd probably find her incredibly rude. It's LJ, I can be honest about that. I loved her continually refer to Peter McKay as "Mr Harper's Representative" in the debates in her home riding and refusing to address him by name, but I hate Peter McKay.


By the time I finished this, the G&M had arrived today. Guess what? You can't tell someone's unhealthy just by looking at their weight! I know I'm shocked. *sigh*
A pony with "Screw world peace, I want a pony!"
Hi.

I'm not actually back - I have a meeting with my thesis advisor, an essay, a final exam, and an argument with my uni about allowing me to continue in my program in the next 30 hours - but I wanted to say hi because I'm incredibly lonely in my ivory tower, and maybe people could suggest something Fun and Light Hearted to do tomorrow when I'm done all those things. Right now I want to go to a roller rink but Don rightly pointed out that they're unlikely to allow his sexy new wheelchair (more on that later - but wow, sexy wheelchair!) onto the rink and he's really not equipped to go roller skating without it.

(Bowling is also out for similar reasons.)

So, there's been this drama going on in Canadian politics over the past... I dunno, however long, and people keep asking my thoughts about it via email so I thought I would cheat and post them here quickly.

Basically, I'm so damned exhausted after the past two and a half weeks of pushing myself between school, work, dramas, thesis, Don's health dramas, and trying to go all Xena on the ass of our local transit authority that, although I *really* have an opinion about Canada's current situation and really have thoughts on it and have even written an email or two to a few close friends on the subject, the mere thought of having even a friendly discussion about my thoughts, let alone open the door to some huge dramatic fight with someone on the topic while each side attempts to play Who Knows The Constitution Better (No, You're Wrong) leaves me in near tears. I just cannot do it.

I don't think I've ever been this exhausted in my life, and the idea that I'm going to spend the next few years punishing my poor body and brain this way is very frightening. The money situation, however, may have worked out in a way that will allow me to drastically cut my hours next semester, if not give up working all together, and that thought, oh, that thought, is what is keeping my head above water right now.

Well, that and the fact that I have no time to get my head under water. I just had a shower. Oh sweet wonderful shower! I bet my coworkers love you too!

(I work with someone who doesn't know what this post is about. I think I love her the bestest of anyone in the whole world right now. Oh Shel, never change.)

Anyway, yes. Roller skating is out. Alcohol is both expensive and best enjoyed when you are not trying to actually make your brain stop working. Fun and awesome wheelchair friendly things?

* * *

Oh wait, I lied. There is one thing about this whole OMG!Canadian drama I will say.

Dear News Media:

It is really really really not relevant to anything at all the number of people who have joined a Facebook group regarding anything. No really, it's not. Stop padding up your wordcount by mentioning Facebook groups. There is real news to report right now, and in the end, the number of Facebook group members, the number of comments on the G&M and CBC website and the dinner served at a recent meeting between three people involved in this drama indicate nothing at all. I'm very happy you're generating page hits, but the number of page hits you're generating is not news.

Love,
Anna.
"Thinking can be dangerous"
Me: Don! Pssst, Don! Wake up! I just had the bestest idea evar!!!

Don: Murble?

Me: Wake up! Trust me! Best idea! Totally worth giving up sleep for right now.

Don: Is this going to be like your idea to become an international pastry thief?

Me: This is much better than that. It'll make us famous!

Don: Oh lord.

Me: See, I had this idea! I'm gonna make an Elizabeth May FanVid! It'll be awesome! I'll set it to that T.a.T.u. song "All The Things She Said"! And in the parts that are like "They say it's my fault / cuz I want her so much", I'll show NDP and Liberal quotes about how the evil Greens stole their votes, and, like, the bit about how we'll go to a place where it's just you and me I'll show the other leaders fading away so it's just Elizabeth! It'll be a sensation!

Don: ....

Me: It'll be awesome! I'll upload it to YouTube, and then people will watch it and talk about it and it'll be famous and then Elizabeth May will come to our house and I can give her a pony!!!!

Don: When was the last time you slept?

Me: I dunno - why do you ask?

ETA:



So true.
Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it
My Election Thoughts:

An awful lot of time and money tossed away on getting us almost, but not exactly, back where we started from.

*sigh*

I'll have deeper thoughts later, I have no doubt, but really? Really? This is it? How banal.

Also, Mr Harper needs to go back to school, where they will explain that having less than a majority of seats, and about 40% of the popular vote, does not a clear mandate make. 60% of those who votes rejected you, and frankly, not nearly enough of us voted anyway. That is not a clear mandate.

So... I'm predicting the first moves in he "Who's Going To Replace Dion" crap will be happening before I wake up for class this afternoon. Anyone willing to start taking bets about how long till the leadership review?
Windows process window.  "Attempting to give a damn. ... Process failed, damn not given."
I'm declaring everywhere within 10 feet of me an Election Free Zone until after I get home from work tomorrow morning. NO SPOILERZ.

(Today was totally not the day for my relief at work to be 45 minutes late. I had only an hour of cushion time for the whole day, and now it is gone. GONE! I hope I have time to vote.)
A fountain pen.  "Just write"
It's been about five days since I wrote an open letter to the organizers of the All Candidate's Forum at Dal.

I haven't heard back officially about the letter I wrote the Megan Leslie Campaign, just a verbal acknowledgement that they had read it from the Campaign Organizer.

The first person to email me back was Mark, the VP (Education) of Dal's SU, and the main organizer behind the event.

Mark's email has all the right noises in it - we're sorry this happened, it was an accessible site, we did schedule an interpreter but the person who requested it ended up sick and the interpreters didn't want to send someone if there was no guarantee. They also got a lot of complaints about the format of the forum and are planning on having written questions next time. He's very sorry if he offended the disabled community. (I've included the whole text of the email at the bottom of this post, behind a cut, incase you want to read it.)

a bit of reaction from me about Mark's email )

The next email I got, later that night (after 10 p.m., which tells me that Darryl is going home from whatever, then checking and answering his email - dude, when does he sleep? Maybe less than I do!) was from the Green Party Candidate, Darryl Whetter.

Darryl's response was the shortest one I got, and I have to admit, it felt like the most honest, the least run-through-someone-first. That's probably not fair as well. Darryl's response, though, is *personal* - he talks about his father's chronic illness. He also says he'll talk to the Dal SU about future events being accessible. (This will, of course, be a more important thing if he gets elected. But it's a nice thought, you know?)

I think the response from Megan's campaign (NDP) came in yesterday, or maybe the day before (the days are all running a bit together in the Anna-verse), and was sent from someone else's email address. This isn't really the End Of The World - I used to work for a guy who wrote all the letters you would get from the MLA he worked for, and it's very common. It was just.. jarring, because I didn't know why I was getting an email about the topic from someone I'd never met until I saw it was "signed" Megan.

It's short, sweet, to the point, brings up the interpreter issue and expresses satisfaction that Mark emailed me back with my concerns. Pretty standard, which isn't a complaint so much as an observation. I'm frustrated that there's been nothing about my earlier complaints about someone telling Don to basically play disabled for a camera. I have no idea what's going on with that at all. I don't want to be angry because it's a really busy election campaign, but if not now, then when? It's certainly not the first time I've brought up issues with how the NDP treats people with disabilities. I'd like it to be the last, and not because I just got disgusted with them and gave up.

Catherine's email (Liberal) came in this morning. It's also short (other than Mark's, they all were). I'm kinda embarrassed to admit that I like this one the most. Catherine basically says "I noticed this to, there were a lot of problems with that forum, and I promise that I won't be participating in any more forums, either as a candidate or as a sitting MP, that aren't fully accessible". She also talks about equity of access, as opposed to equal access.

I really felt Catherine got it, you know? That this isn't just about placating the crazy-lady who's been thrown out of a rally this week (um... yeah, I got thrown out of a rally this week because "Make Poverty History" isn't "on message" for a "Rally Around The Leader". Since every leader has been in Halifax this week, that'll leave things suitably vague). I just really felt that Catherine understood what I was going for, which isn't just a pat on the head but a real change for the better.

Who knows.

Your interpretation of these emails may be different than mine, and I've included them here. I'd like any thoughts you have on the subject in general or the emails in particular.

I feel this fight is going to get harder before it gets easier. It really shocked me how completely inaccessible the microphone was for this forum. I don't know how things were for the Social Justice Forum on Thursday, since I fell asleep so hard Don couldn't wake me before it (and then when I woke up for work it took me 20 minutes to find the energy to talk, so yes, sleeping = win), but I hope it was better.

emails behind the cut, in order described above )
A fountain pen.  "Just write"
Dear Mark,

Earlier this year I was thrilled to learn about Dalhousie's new Mark A. Hill Accessibility Centre, dedicated to lowering the barriers that make it difficult, if not impossible, for people with disabilities to attend university. Having watched Don, who struggles with a chronic-pain related condition, take over 10 years to complete his bachelor's degree (the final year being at Dal), I know how important it is for people with disabilities to have advocates, to have a safe space, and to have it acknowledged that it's not a simple as just attending classes.

The stated goal of the Mark A. Hill Accessibility Centre is ensuring equal opportunity for all students as part of Dalhousie’s commitment to equality of access. I was unable to attend the dedication ceremony on 3 October, but I'm certain that this was a point that was repeatedly brought home.

It's too bad that Dal's SU didn't think that students with disabilities would want equality of access to ask questions of their candidates during the All Candidate's Forum on Monday evening.

The process of asking questions involved pushing past a lineup of people at a microphone (and getting near the front would mean having known the format of how questions would be asked from the beginning). At that point, those waiting to ask questions could be expected to stand up for over two hours, with no guarantee that they would get a chance to have their voices heard. By the end, I was exhausted, and I cannot imagine Don, or those with chronic pain or mobility-related disabilities that do not require a wheelchair, being able to stand for that long. The microphone locations were never announced for the benefit of those who could not see them, and if there was a translator available for those who are Deaf, it was never referred to or offered at any point during the debate.

People with disabilities are often invisible, or used as "poster children" to say "look, we care!" In my experience, though, those with disabilities are often forgotten about, or assumed not to want to be involved.

I am angry that with the vast numbers of people who must have been involved in the planning of this All Candidates Forum, from Dal's SU, Dalhousie University, the moderator, and the staff of each of our five candidates, not one person thought that PWD should have the opportunity to speak, to ask questions, and to engage with the person who will be representing them in Ottawa next week.

I suspect that many of the people involved in Monday's forum will be involved in future forums, be they provincial or federal. I ask, sincerely, that those who will be involved again brainstorm with the people at the Mark A. Hill Accessibility Center on ways that PWD, especially students, can ask questions and otherwise interact with the candidates at the public forum. Perhaps a dedicated microphone just for those with mobility issues, and have that microphone brought to them instead of expecting them to push through the crowd. Perhaps instead of a microphone, having all questions written down throughout the evening and have them drawn out of a hat and presented to the moderator by another volunteer. Perhaps having signs and announcements throughout the evening addressing issues of accessibility and encouraging those who are often invisible to step forward and be heard.

One in seven people live with a disability. It is a non-discriminating minority group that anyone can join, from a slip in the shower to a a high fever to the realities of aging. There is nothing to say that every able-bodied person reading this email will not become part of this group. Should that happen, I doubt that you would want to be marginalized, or to be told, directly or indirectly, that you are not expected to be part of society.

Please remember this when you are planning your next meeting for the community.

Sincerely,

Anna Pearce

C: Megan Leslie, NDP
Catherine Meade, Liberal
Ted Larson, Conservative
Darryl Whetter, Green
Tony Seed, MLP
Mark A. Hill Accessibility Centre
Editor, Dal Gazette

* First Truth: I'm getting tired of writing these letters.
Second Truth: PWD were referred to all of once on Monday, in the closing remarks of one of the candidates (Megan, for those playing at home).

** So, for those of you who are attending forums in your own communities, for whatever reason (be they election related or otherwise): Are they fully accessible? And if not... can you write the letter? Even if Disability isn't a part of your life right now, there's a really good chance it will be within your lifetime. Start advocating now.

I am totally available (in that I'm totally available for anything right now - plz note my time constraints!) to help with any letter writing, article writing, or brain storming.

It shouldn't be just those of us who live with a disability advocating. It should be all of us. They can't ignore all of us.
A wee My Little Pony sleeping, with Zzzzzz
Did you know that if you're really really really tired because you haven't gotten enough sleep in three days that if you sing the songs from the Buffy Musical you can push yourself through and stay awake longer?

(If you were waiting for a response for me on anything, it's not coming now till Wednesday or Friday.)

(I totally didn't write this at work last night to keep myself awake, because that would be wrong.)

Last night I went to the All Candidates Debate. I think if I had stayed home and slept instead, I'd regret that decision as much as I currently regret going instead of sleeping. I'm so tired I'm seeing spots, and all for... well, nothing really.

I did touch base very breifly with Megan's campaign director, but other than acknowledging they'd received my email, there was no response to its contents. I'm assuming this is primarily because it's OMG election in a week and OMG candidate's forum, and not because they're ignoring me.

However, expect another open letter on the subejct as soon as I've had a few more hours of sleep. I am pissed at what happened last night, and I think that a lot of you should be, too. But I'll explain later.

Vote for me or Stevie Harper will HATE YOU )
Sleep now.
A fountain pen.  "Just write"
[Before you read this letter, I should tell you - I wrote it in the middle of the night. It may not be the best, but I couldn't stand the idea of not sending it right away, being that the All Canadidates Forum is tonight.]

Dear Megan,

You're probably unaware of an incident in the US that happened last week. A long-term volunteer for MADD was "fired" - the public deemed her too disgusting and disturbing to be seen in public. She's a woman with severe disabilities caused by having been hit by a drunk driver.* Her appearance hadn't changed, but suddenly she was unacceptable. You can read about it here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20081001-1149-drunkendrivingexample.html


There's a history of telling people with disabilities that they're unacceptable in public - from the controversy over whether or not to show FDR in his wheelchair in a memorial to his presidency to the lack of people with disabilities on t.v. to the institutions that kept people locked away from public view for their own good. Even now, in our "more enlightened age", people stare at Don when he's in his rented wheelchair, and no one thinks there's anything wrong with asking rude questions about his appearance.

I'm telling you this because I want to lay the groundwork for why someone in your campaign telling Don that he had either stand up or make it clear why he isn't was very offensive. Again, that wonderful message - look normal, or look like a proper cripple, and I get to determine that that means.

Disabilities come both visible and invisible, and Don did not suddenly becomë "more" disabled when we finally insisted that he needed a cane to walk. In fact, he became less so, because the cane allowed him to do more things. Someone who barely knows Don except to nod at him at a party function telling him how to behave, what is "acceptable" behavior for him as a person with a disability at a party function, tells me a lot about the attitudes that still persist within the NDP.

I guess my kitchen table doesn't count.

Over the past few months of volunteering with the NDP, it's been clear to me that PWD still have a long way to go with the Party before they'll be considered. Whenever I have tried to discuss with staff or MLAs at the provincial level that their website is not accessible for people with text readers, they have either acted surprised or hostile. The first time I mentioned this was at the nomination meeting for Leonard, and still nothing has been done to fix this. I have mentioned that those who have English as a second language, hearing difficulties, or both would need someone to speak clearly and face the crowd. I was put off as though I had said something ridiculous. I know for certain that there are people in the NDP with hearing difficulties. I guess that they also aren't part of the kitchen table.

Megan, I'll admit it - I'm an Anna-Come-Lately to the NDP. Don's been talking to me for five years trying to convince me that the NDP represented my views politically, and would be a good use of the few hours I can give a month to volunteer causes (I have been volunteering at the provincial level). Don's volunteered for two federal campaigns (both yours, and the one for Malcolm in Edmonton-Strathcona), and has been a Member At Large for the NDP provincially in Leonard's Riding. But to make it clear how little his disability is even acknowledged, he was put in a room on the second floor of a walkup at the last Convention, and the only person who seemed to respect that he has a disability that makes many things he does difficult was Alexa - someone who hadn't met him before (and, it should be noted, the only person I know in the NDP who spent a day in a wheelchair, and discussed seriously earlier this year how poverty affects PWD disproprotionately).

The point of all this isn't for you to do anything right now. It's been a tough election season, and I, as a citizen of Halifax, want you to blow the competition out of the water. I believe in you, Megan. But, once the election is over, and you're comfortably in Jack Layton's board room, can you take it upon yourself to start making clear to him, his team, your team, the provincial team, the NDP party at large - people with disabilities exist. They vote. They matter. They don't all look acceptable in public, and they don't owe it to the NDP, to Jack Layton, or even to me and you to look like someone thinks a "cripple" should before they're allowed to not stand up and cheer.

My kitchen table currently has 4 different medications sitting on it, and a space for a wheelchair. Í'd really like that kitchen table to count, too.

Anna


* There's certainly a conversation that could be had about exploiting disabilities to shock people into proper behavior, but I'm not up to having it right now. I spent most of last night reading pretty nasty things about disability history, and mostly I just hate everyone. Except you, of course.

** Does anyone want to speculate on why none of the party websites I've visited today have a "text only" option?

*** I called all the campaing offices this morning to confirm if they were accessible or not. I think it says a lot about someone whether or not I need to explain "no, wheelchair accessible" to them.
Linus of Charlie Brown "There are three things you don't discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin"
In case you missed it, Mr Harper decided last week to ignore criminologists and other legal experts and pledged to revamp the Young Offenders Act and a few other things and make Canada Tough On Crime. (Sadly, I have mostly been following this in the Dead Tree News, but here is The Star's take on it.)

[livejournal.com profile] zingerella writes a very strongly worded letter to Mr Harper on the subject of ignoring experts in order to score political points.

In your capacity as the leader of the party that forms Canada's government, you and the people with whom you work directly have access to all manner of experts, in all different areas. I must wonder why you disdain their work and insist that your government will look to "ordinary Canadians" to understand problems that Canadians face. To ignore the body of research and study into criminology and how societies can better reduce crime and deal with people who commit crime is akin to ignoring the expertise of one of your speech-writers and instead asking your veterinarian to write your speeches for you. Your vet may have some good ideas, but chances are he or she doesn't have the expertise needed to craft an effective speech. It's like asking me how best to make sure all Canadians have access to clean drinking water: sure, like any ordinary Canadian, I have opinions, but you'd really be better off entrusting water purification to an expert in water filtration systems (or whatever appropriate expert exists).

Mr. Harper, as an ordinary Canadian, I already have access, all on my own, to the expertise of other ordinary Canadians. You are the prime minister. You work in the government. You have access to all of my tax dollars and those of my fellow ordinary Canadians, and you can use those dollars to pay experts—people who have spent their lives learning about something specific—to advise you, for the greater good of all Canadians.


Read the whole thing.
Wee little kitten, mouth open, with "rar!" in the corner
We (We) Are (Are) Ordinary People by Gayleen Froese:

By Harper’s lights, ordinary Canadians shouldn’t want to be artists, or to work in museums, or to be publishers or editors or audio engineers or cinematographers or concert hall managers or play directors or festival organizers or anything else creative children and adults might dream about.

They should want to wear blue plastic smocks, and to be silent, and to hear little of substance from the people around them. They should not want to make things of their own, or to run their own businesses and their own dreams and their own lives. Taking a shit job at minimum wage is what good, upstanding people do. The government will tax their low wages and give their tax money to millionaires in order to make this possible for everyone.

Ordinary people are to buy what the wealthy want them to buy, pay for it twice, and like it.

If Harper’s been calling you an ordinary Canadian–as he has, by extension, been calling me a deviant–you ought to be even more insulted than I am. Because what he’s calling you is not what you are and it’s nothing you want to be.


As I said over there, I love being called an elitist ivory-tower snob by someone with a full-time image consultant, a home paid for by tax-payers, and a yearly salary more than I'm ever likely to make in my lifetime.

I live in a flat furnished almost entirely by stuff other people threw out, I ate rice for 10 meals out of the last 15, and we finally (finally!) got approval for funding for Don's wheelchair because even the NS government thinks we're pretty poorly off (actually, no, they don't - it's a charity that thinks we are. Go Go Conservative Government!), but MY PRIME MINISTER says I'm an elitist snob because I think it would be nice to go to a museum and not have to save up for a month to do it.

*sigh*

Gayleen says it better, but she's an elitist sob who has a book published, so that's to be expected.
Meg from Disney's Hercules.  "I'm a damsel.  I'm in distress.  I can handle it."
I just archived nearly 7000 messages in my inbox.

If you thought I had forgotten you, it's not true! I lost you! I'm very sad!

Anyway, one of the things I archived deleted include this little message:

You are invited to join the Conservative Party’s Text community! By joining our text community, you will receive up to the minute campaign news on your cell phone.*

* To join: Simply text the word “PARTY” to TXTCPC (898272)

Text the word “STOP” at any time to TXTCPC (898272) to opt-out.


Now, what's interesting to me about this campaign is that the newspaper here in Halifax dedicated front page news yesterday to the way cell phone costs have sky-rocketed once the cellular companies started charging for incoming texts. (Sadly, the Chronicle-Herald site is down right now, but you can read a bit about it in this call to action from July on the NDP website.)

[To my friends who are scratching your heads because you live in Cell Phone Heaven (that is, the UK or Australia), I cannot tell you how much I miss having a cell phone from either of those places. Sometimes, I take my cell phones out the box I still keep them in and pretend I can text people again. Woe.]

I just find this campaign interesting in light of the consumer backlash to the rising costs of cell phones. "Join our texting party! And you, too, can be charged money just to hear about us!"
Windows process window.  "Attempting to give a damn. ... Process failed, damn not given."
Oh goody!

Our election here in Canada was called whilst I was sleeping, and my inbox is now filled with emailed pleas to vote for this party and against that party and Change and Safety and Taxes and "We think of average Canadians and THEY DON'T" and dog whistles, and it's great. (Except, you know, not.)

The election is on and Canadians face a clear choice.

A choice between strong leadership that’s on the side of ordinary Canadians or weak leadership that’s totally out-of-touch.

A choice between focused spending and lower taxes or wild spending and higher taxes; a choice between tough-on-crime or soft-on-crime; a choice between a strong Canada that stands up for its values and interests or a weak Canada that refuses to stand up and be counted; a choice between Stephen Harper and Stéphane Dion.


I love this, in the way I love trolls and performance art, because it's so ridiculous I can barely breath.

First, Canada is not a two party system. Right now, we've got the Conservatives (who I got this email from), the Liberals (who the Conservatives are trying to pretend are the Only Other Choice), the NDP, and the Green Party. (The Bloc Quebecois don't run candidates out here in Nova Scotia.) There's also a handful of other parties, from left to right, running candidates here and there. The Conservatives and the Liberals are not the only choices, Mr Harper!

Second... wait, what? "Tough on Crime"? What sort of crime are you tough on, Mr Harper? Are you going to do something about police officers shouting racial slurs at black men in Truro? Are you going to tackle white collar crimes? Are you going to do a serious look at our prison system and the ratios between prisoners and guards? Are you going to look at our laws about violence and hate crimes? Are you going to increase funding to social systems in First Nations Communities to confront the issues that lead to higher suicide rates, higher rates of violence against women, and higher rates of police brutality? Are you going to look into the serial murderer who has been killing prostitutes in Edmonton?

Oh, no, wait. I got a flyer in the mail about this last week! They're going to be "tough on junkies" who go after our playgrounds.

Yeah.

Also "Ordinary Canadians"? What am I, Welsh? Norwegian? Oh, wait, I forgot: I'm a strident Elitist!

All of this stuff is crappy rhetoric. This is not an either/or choice. My options are not "Harper and lower taxes" (while Don and I struggle to pay our rent because we qualify for no social assistance whatsoever because I'm a student) OR "Dion and Crazy Spending" (which may lead to Don & I struggling to pay our power bill). I have a plethora of options. And telling me how I should vote for the Conservatives or Bad Things Will Happen is just shite. Tell me how awesome Canada will be with another Conservative government. Don't bloody well scare monger at me.

(And this goes double for every other party out there. C'mon, folks - tell me you're awesome. I know that all the other parties are scary and will ruin Canada for future generations. What are you going to do instead?)

Anyway, Happy Election Season All. I'm sure the next 5 weeks in Canada (and the next eternity in the US) will be fun for the whole family.

Profile

Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it
Anna (troubleinchina)

March 2010

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Layout Credit

Layout:
regna
Resources:
Beeex.net
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios