trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)
We have started the process of attempting to get Don health care.

Logically, this should be simple: Canadian moves from one province to another, Canadian receives health care using Canadian's health care card from previous province until residency requirements are met for the new province's health care to kick in.

In practice, things are very different. Don's spent two days on the phone with various people about getting a doctor in the city. Ha ha, ha ha ha.

First call was to the HealthCareConnect people to find a GP that was taking patients. They will not help him because in order to use HealthCareConnect one needs to have a valid Ontario Health Care Card. Don cannot get a valid Ontario Health Care Card until October. We think. It might be longer.

HealthCareConnect refers Don to a website. The website is woefully out of date. He finally finds a GP that is taking patients and that doctor's office says "Well, awesome, but you have to register with HealthCareConnect before we can take you."

So, Don calls back HealthCareConnect and someone there feels sorry for him and kicks him up a level. That person reveals that she can give him phone numbers for some "community care centers" that are required to take him even if he doesn't have an Ontario health care card, but they're basically like walk-in clinics. There is no regular GP that you'll see (necessary for someone like Don who has a wide variety of health issues, is using a wheelchair full time, and needs careful prescription management) and they don't prescribe the medications he uses to manage pain.

Okay then. I call up our MPP's office. At first I am told that, no no, you can immediately just go into a Service Ontario office and get your health care sorted. The three month waiting period is only for newcomers to Canada. This is fascinating to me as it contradicts absolutely everything else I have ever read and would make Ontario unique amongst Canadian provinces. I ask him to confirm and he spends some time looking at websites and declares that things are "a bit unclear." He tells me that he'll call his contact at the Ministry of Health and get back to me.

So, here we are. Don has enough medication to cover him for a month. With some of his medication, if he can't get a new scrip, he will die. (Slowly, granted, so probably something could be sorted before he slipped into a coma, but who the fuck knows.) Now it's no longer a matter of "medication is expensive", it's a matter of "can we even get it?"

But gosh, if only cripples were more positive thinkers, everything would be easier.

Oh, and by the way: If Don were moving into a long-term care center, then he'd automatically get an Ontario health care card.
trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)
We voted! It was awesome! I love voting.

Our polling station was mostly good for accessibility issues. The door was heavy and didn't have a button, so points down for that, and the signs were difficult to see coming up to them because of the other signs in front.

But the space was wheelchair accessible, no one blinked or made faces or reacted to Don being there, they treated him like he was an adult rather than baby talking to him. (Note: baby talk in Canada is not the same thing as simple language. It's the high sing-song voice and slightly-above-babbling that parents use to their toddlers.) There was enough space for him to get his chair (which is a monster of a chair) behind the polling both for him to vote privately, and they told him openly and happily that if there were any problems they'd be happy to move things around for him. They were proactive and eager to be helpful. It was awesome.

My disappointments were the door, the sign, and that they didn't offer anyone an accessibility form to fill out. If you are looking for one, you can get an accessibility feedback form at the Elections Canada website.

But. All that aside, the voting has been accomplished, and now comes the waiting.
trouble: "No, you don't get it!  If you die in Canada, you die in Real Life!" (If you die in Canada)
Video & Song behind cut )

Lyrics )

Oh my gosh, I just want the election to be over so the healing can begin.
trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)
I am a little (veeeeerrrrry) drunk so I will make this short.

Oh Internets! Look how much the candidates in Antigonish value accessibility!

Antigonish: Disability-related barriers to Central Nova campaign headquarters

I have photographed campaign offices to see to what extent the entrances to the four Central Nova candidates' Antigonish campaign headquarters accommodate persons with disabilities, via wheelchair ramps, automated doors and elevators.


(Spoilers: None of them pass this accessibility test. The Liberals get part marks.)

Central Nova! Former riding of Green Party Leader Elizabeth May (she's moved to B.C.). Current riding of Peter McKay, Conservative Party candidate, Minister of Defense, IIRC. (Home of Emmy's mom. Emmy's mom is awesome.)

I am just sayin'.

<3 Anna
trouble: Icon showing the standard "accessibility" icons - wheelchair user, Sign, cane, and information (Accessibility)
I know, I know, I'm impossible to please.

The Green Party released their platform [PDF] (today? I'm not sure, I learned of it over twitter) and I did the insta-search for disability issues because I am a One Issue Voter and that's all that matters to me. They have a very pretty sounding platform for a party that doesn't have any seats, but I will totally give them that they talk about disability. I have no idea what's going on with accessibility and PDFs, but the bit relevant to disability I shall quote below. It is on page 74.

I have put it below this cut because it is really dull )
Green Party MPs will:

• Work to create a Canada Disabilities Act (CDA) to express Canadians' vision of a more equitable society rather than the current confusion resulting from the multiplicity of acts,
standards, policies and programs that prevail.

• Support a national equipment fund to provide equipment such as wheel chairs and accessibility tools to assist persons with disabilities with the tools needed to fully participate in work and community life. (This can be a joint program with provinces – the concern is equal access and common standards.)

• Invest in social housing adapted as necessary to meet particular needs, with both rental and purchase options. This is simply an expansion of our housing program recognizing particular needs.

• Provide federal health transfer payments to provinces and territories directed to rehabilitation for those who have become disabled, e.g. loss of limbs etc.

• Enforce the Employment Equity Act to ensure that persons with disabilities have equal opportunity to long-term employment and advancement. Disabled people are generally
the last to find employment and the first to be laid off.

Urge government to immediately ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Canada is a former Human Rights leader in the global community; the current continued dragging of our political heels is embarrassing. Ratifying this Convention and implementing it will help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, to which all countries have committed themselves.

• Institute a basic income for people living with disabilities so that none live in poverty by:
• Converting the Disability Tax Credit (DTC) to a refundable credit as a first step in creating a national Basic Income program for working-age adults with disabilities.
• Redesigning the Canada Pension Plan/Disability Benefit (CPP/D) test to incorporate the DTC definition of disability and permit employment, rather than the CPP/D definition that requires a ‘severe’ disability to be life-long and to be the cause of any incapacity to
pursue ‘any gainful occupation.’ The revised definition allows individuals to work while retaining eligibility for basic income.


I've bolded the thing that stands out to me as a wee bit odd.

The Green Party MPs will lobby the government to support the UN Convention on the rights of PWD... that we ratified in March of 2010.

I like the plan, but I must admit to being highly skeptical of it. Nor have I read the rest of the platform. But I put it out there for y'all to enjoy.
trouble: Spock from Star Trek: The Original Series, holding a cat "No, Mr Bond, I expect you to die" (I expect you to die)
You would never believe that I am actively trying to avoid election news. I did not, for example, know that some irritating person had floated the idea of an Ignatieff-Harper US-style "leadership" debate until the idea had already been sunk. (And that idea horrifies me. No. No. I know that the question of who is going to form the government is going to continue to bounce back and forth between the Liberals and Conservatives for the foreseeable future, but yes, I want to hear what the NDP, the Bloc and even the Greens have to say. I do not want a formal two party system!)

Anyway. Today in election related headlines:

The current headline on this is Liberals Turf Quebec Candidate but there's every indication it used to be a different headline.

A news release by the NDP accused Liberal candidate André Forbes of making disparaging remarks about First Nations and Innu people. The release says he's a former leader of l’Association des Droits des Blancs, the Association for the Rights of Whites, in Sept-Iles, Que.

In a statement Wednesday afternoon, Ignatieff said Forbes has been informed he is no longer a Liberal candidate and that his comments "have no place within the Liberal Party of Canada."

“The Liberal Party of Canada has always stood for equality among all citizens, including First Nations, Métis, Inuit, and non-Aboriginal Canadians," he said. "We categorically condemn any comments that seek to divide Canadians on the basis of their culture or ethnicity."

Forbes reportedly referred to Aboriginals as "featherheads" in an interview with L'actualité published in October, 2004.


(I heard of this via Ignorance and Slurs: Indigenous Election Coverage, by Dan Wilson, which points out how little attention is being paid to the tainted or lack of water issues in First Nations communities versus the three week long (at least) media coverage of tainted water in Walkerton, Ontario.)

RCMP admits ejecting people from Tory rallies: Force has reminded officers that only responsibility is to protect leaders

"The RCMP assisted the party organizers in restricting access to persons not registered for the private event," Sgt. Greg Cox said in the statement.

"This was not in accordance with the RCMP's mandate, and RCMP members have been reminded of our responsibilities."

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper continued to be dogged by questions Wednesday surrounding stories the party ousted a student from a Conservative event because a Facebook photo showed her posing with Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff.


Harper is, of course, spinning this as "We have to turn people away!" as though it's about having too many people at the rallies. He may be trying to make a very dry humour joke about it, but I admit, since I don't like him, I'm taking him as trying to deflect attention away from the fact that someone at his rallies takes the job of going through the names of everyone who signs up for them (you have to sign up in advance) and looking up their Facebook pages.

(Wanna watch them dance around the question? Conservatives try to explain student ejections from rallies. There seems to be a video but I haven't watched it and I can't transcribe it because of my ear.)

I'm surprised, frankly, that this is getting more play than the Homeless Veterans activist that was refused entry to an event here in Halifax. I guess the 'small group' didn't include "people who work to end homelessness for Veterans with PTSD."

A Dartmouth volunteer who helps homeless veterans was turned away from a Stephen Harper election rally last week and the man calls it a slap in the face to those who have been injured in service of their country.

Jim Lowther of the Veterans Emergency Transition Team said he is apolitical but will stand with anyone who promises to help the people he helps: former Canadian Forces members who find themselves living on the street, often as a result of psychological disorders caused by their service.

Lowther has been trying to set up a meeting with Harper to seek help for veterans but has been rebuffed.

On Thursday, he and fellow veterans advocate Gary Zwicker went to the Halterm container pier on the Halifax waterfront hoping to get a few minutes with Harper, or at least to watch his speech. But a Conservative staffer in a suit and tie denied them entry at the gate.


*throws hands up in despair* Election season hurts my soul.
trouble: (Media Conglomerate)
Well, in general I'd say no one, but apparently I am wrong! This is both strange and a bit frightening, even though of course the difference between talking about disability and doing something that impacts on the lives of Actual Disabled People are two entirely different things.

The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (the CCD) have sent out a press release informing everyone that the Liberals have actually put disability-issues on their platform. I tried to find this information out on the Liberal website, but I struggled. See, their website is a mess of inaccessibility, which I know they've been informed of because I informed them of it. WebAim detects 46 accessibility-related errors just on their front page, and none of their videos provide actual captioning. Lucky we have YouTube auto-captions to the rescue, right?

Description appears below

Description: It's a screen capture from a YouTube video. Michael Ignatieff, an older white politician, is captioned as saying "And we met start ninety one for you".

Larger versions of the image are available.

I would tell you what he's actually saying but I have an ear infection so I have no idea. And neither would the indeterminate number of Canadians who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

You can watch the video yourself, though.

When I did finally poke around on the website, all I found about the Liberal election platform on disability wasfamily care and a national pharmacare plan.

(I will address the national pharmacare plan briefly: I think it's relatively pathetic. I know I should be all happy because pharmacare! but all I can think is "Okay, yes, catastrophic illness, go you! But what about chronic long-term ones?" It's possibly this will be covered, as they mention diabetes and arthritis, but they specifically use the language of catastrophic illness.)

The Family Care plans that have been bandied about by the Liberals and Harper have been really firmly aimed at a particular demographic: two-income homes where either a child or an elderly parent is in need of long-term care from a family member (because the hospitals refuse to accept them because they're too sick to treat). I know this because of what they're offering. Harper offered a $300 tax credit to people who stay home to take care of a family member. The Liberals are offering either six months of EI benefits or, to people who do not work in jobs that contribute to EI, a "Family Care Tax Benefit", which is a monthly tax-free payment.

Gentle reader, let us consider that "Family Care Tax Benefit" for a moment. This is the thing I'm supposed to be most impressed with, the thing that is most likely to help my family.

First, some background: I am the caregiver to my wonderful husband, Don, who was born with Marfan Syndrome. In July of last year his health took a series of hits, and by January of this year he was in bed basically 24 hours a day except for twice a day trips to the bathroom. He is taking enough pain relieving drugs that he cannot operate a stove safely, he cannot risk a shower even with the shower chair, he has difficulties keeping track of how many of his meds he's taken, and just earlier this week flew into a panic because he couldn't find one of his medications because he had completely forgotten that I had handed him the new prescription the day before. Many of his current problems are being blamed on his gastro-intestinal issues that cropped up in July, and the current theory is that once those are actually treated, his pain levels will drop, he'll be able to go back on his lower-dose medications, and he'll go back to being able to get out of the house three or four times a week, run errands, take care of the garbage and recycling and laundry, and all of those things that he does when he's not crippled by the health care system. His GI appointment is on Thursday.

I've taken off three months this year in order to care for him.

The hospital tells me that this has nothing to do with his health at all, while simultaneously telling me that they're sending him home instead of admitting him because he's got someone at home who can help him with tasks like eating and going to the bathroom.

Okay, so, here is our household, where there is only one adult who is able to work, rather than two, because the other adult in the household is permanently disabled, and the working adult has had to take time off to care for the other.

How much money do you think we would need in order to run our household and ensure Don received regular meals he can eat (which right now is limited to dry cereal, apple sauce, pudding, and frozen waffles), the power and phone stayed turn on, and we could afford the medications that he needs to live? Oh, and rent. Absolutely nothing else: not internet, not fancy meals, not even food enough for me, just food enough for Don. Just, add that up in your head.

The Liberals think it's, at the maximum, $112.50 per month.

Oh, but Anna! You should have savings! Things you can draw on. And yes, gentle reader, we do. We are currently living off money that we have been gifted by extended family members. We can do this because our families have both regularly been sending money to support us. If we didn't, I'm sure I would have to go back to working two jobs in order to have enough money to keep Don comfortable and ensure he was never out of meds, because that's what we had to do before. And when you're working two crappy-paying jobs, you can't find the time to get out of either one of them into something that pays better. And how much of my income would end up going to someone else to take care of Don (or at least check in on him) because I'd never be home?

"Poverty Eradication Plans" often do not include people with disabilities because the costs associated with living with disabilities are quite high. People with disabilities are disproportionately living in poverty: while 10% of Canadians overall live in poverty, 15% of Canadians with disabilities do. They end up doing things like splitting their life-saving medications to make the prescriptions last longer. They don't take their meds and get sicker. They don't get access to things like canes or walkers or wheelchairs because those things cost money and the amount of paperwork required to get in on charities that will pay for them is very high. It is difficult to get work when you're disabled. It is difficult to access community supports when you're disabled. It is difficult to get housing when you're disabled.

$112.50 per month, and that's still more than the Conservatives are offering.

According to the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, this is what the Liberal platform includes:


  • An "action plan" for implementing, monitoring and reporting on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Canada ratified in 2010.

  • Restoring funding to the Court Challenges program, which has been used by Canadians with Disabilities to force Via Rail to follow the law and have wheelchair accessible train cars.

  • The Liberals have "promised to address the housing needs of persons with disabilities" in their Affordable Housing plans



I promised I would vote for the first party I felt was actually going to address the needs of Canadians with disabilities. I've been encouraged to vote for the Liberals because of these highlighted issues.

Perhaps this post makes it clear why my vote is still up for grabs.
trouble: "No, you don't get it!  If you die in Canada, you die in Real Life!" (If you die in Canada)
I have been following with dismay the decision of the government of New Brunswick (NB), a Canadian province, to dismantle the New Brunswick Advisory Council on the Status of Women (ACSW).

I have, however, not been surprised.

Some Background )

About The Issue (from the blog for the ACSW):

During his election campaign, David Alward promised that, if elected, he would consult with the New Brunswick Advisory Council on the Status of Women. Then he released the 2011 provincial budget, which abolishes the New Brunswick Advisory Council on the Status of Women, effective April 1st.

The government is stating that the NB ACSW is going to be absorbed into the government’s existing internal Women’s Issues Branch to “eliminate overlap” and that this move is not an attempt to “water down the activities” of the organization. The government has stated that there will be no staffing reduction as a result of this move.

Of course, the Women’s Issues Branch and the ACSW do not overlap and the Women’s Issues Branch cannot simply absorb the work of the ACSW. The ACSW’s defining feature (and the reason it is so important) is that it is an arms-length agency that has the freedom to criticize the government, its policies and its decisions. By its very nature, as a government department the Women’s Issues Branch cannot act as an independent voice for the women of New Brunswick the way that the ACSW does. (There is also a staff reduction as a result of the abolition of the ACSW: two full-time staff have been offered positions with the Women’s Issues Branch while one full-time staff and a part-time contract worker have not.)


But what does the NB ACSW actually do? (This is long, because they do a lot of things) )
Why is this happening? )

Okay, what can I do if I don't live in NB? )

Where can I learn more? )

What happens next?

This Thursday, the NB Legislature (the provincial government) will debate the motion to reinstate the NB ACSW, as proposed by the opposition Liberals. Hopefully the outcry against this decision will lead to a change.

It is not too late to stand up in solidarity. I hope you will be able to do so, and add your words to those calling for the continued existence and support of the New Brunswick Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

[Cross-posted to [community profile] politics]
trouble: Icon showing the standard "accessibility" icons - wheelchair user, Sign, cane, and information (Accessibility)
For someone who doesn't want to talk about the election at all, I am certainly talking about the election a lot.

Canadians! Do me a favour when you interact with the politically-motivated over the next 35 days: Ask them about the accessibility of the campaign they are part of or heading.

Keep these issues, brought up by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, in mind:

Some examples of components of an accessible election campaign:

  • Television advertisements with captioning and descriptive video [I would add YouTube videos as well]

  • Accessible web sites

  • Plain language campaign materials

  • Offices with level access and other features of universal design

  • ASL/LSQ interpretation at public meetings

  • Inclusion of people with disabilities, particularly youth with disabilities, as campaign volunteers [Not as mascots, for crying out loud]

  • Town hall meetings in accessible locations, where there is designated handicapped parking

  • Campaign offices that are barrier-free




I am more than happy to expand on any of these topics, and even have in my collection of information links to offices that will happily work with politicians to ensure their campaigns are as accessible as possible. But I am really tired, and if politicians and their campaigners can afford to pay someone to design their campaign material, they can also afford to pay someone to ensure that same material is accessible.
trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)
As many readers are no doubt aware, hundreds of First Nations women have gone "missing" - presumed murdered - over the past decades. This is a vastly under-reported issue, due in part to the fact that many of the missing women were also sex workers. As many sex-workers have pointed out, the disdain shown towards sex workers in Canada (thus making their disappearances less newsworthy or even worth investigation) is part of what allowed serial killer Robert Pickton to murder women for years before anyone really noticed. Sex workers are especially disposable.

First Nations women in Canada have come together to raise awareness about this issue, and for several years have been holding "Sisters in Spirit" vigils to raise awareness, and to mourn the missing and the dead. These have been increasingly successful - every year there are more people who come to these vigils, and every year there is just a smidgen more attention paid to the issue. As well, the First Nations women who have come together on this issue have created a database that collects all the information available about First Nations women who have gone missing.

The project was the catalyst that thrust the issue of missing and murdered Aboriginal women into the public consciousness. Its meticulous research into now nearly 600 cases broke new ground in a realm that had been previously ignored. Its national database became the first of its kind in Canada in its scope and detail.

Sisters in Spirit has received recognition from human rights organizations like Amnesty International. Police agencies and provincial governments have approached the project's staff to share information.

Sisters in Spirit was also approached by police in British Colombia and government officials to become involved in the recently announced inquiry into police work around serial killer Robert Pickton's case and a parallel process to culminate in a summit focusing on violence faced by Aboriginal women.


The Federal Government will only agree to continue to fund this groundbreaking money if they drop the Sisters in Spirit name.

New money would be contingent on taking the name Sisters in Spirit out of the proposal. They also said that none of the money could be spent on the database.

Losing the name would be a serious blow to NWAC. Sisters in Spirit, intertwined with its Grandmother Moon logo, has grown to represent the memories and stories of the missing and the dead women.

Sisters in Spirit vigils are held every year to commemorate murdered and missing Aboriginal women and the Grandmother Moon logo is often prominently displayed at these national events.

If the database of the hundreds of murdered and missing women cases turns stagnant, it remains unclear what could take its place. Before the database came into being, it was up to individuals posting on scattered websites to keep the search for missing Aboriginal women going.


This is only the latest in a long line of funding cuts for programs that focus on women.

Canadians, I urge you to become aware of this issue. All of these quotes come from Rabble's article Sisters in Spirit program used by feds to 'squeeze' Native Women's Association of Canada. This is also an issue that Jessica Yee, "a self-described multiracial Indigenous hip-hop feminist reproductive justice freedom fighter!" often writes about these issues in spaces such as Ms Magazine, Shameless and Racilicious. Racilious' articles about First Nations people are under this category.

Note: As this has happened in the past, please let me be as clear as possible: I don't want to read any comments on my post that can be summed up as "if sex workers don't want to be treated badly, they shouldn't be sex workers." If someone else leaves a comment like that and I haven't had a chance to deal with it, I would ask you please to not engage with it. I'll deal with it as soon as possible.
trouble: "History Major: If you need me, come find me in the archives" (archives)
Me: Oh, hey, Nocturne is this weekend, do you want to go?

Don: Um, not really, as much fun as going around and not being able to get into most of the venues could be.

Me: Oh no! We could go to the archives for Nocturne! There will be free I Heart Archives buttons! And also, they are wheelchair accessible!

Don: Ooh, that could be interesting!

And that's how the Nova Scotia Archives Saved Nocturne.

Also, look at this:

As a bonus... we're also having:

- a "listening station" available so folks can listen to folk songs and ghost stories recorded by Helen Creighton.
- an artist's desk recreated, featuring watercolours and handmade valentines.
- storage boxes from the Victoria School of Art and Design.
- Victorian-era marbled paper for you book-binding nerds.
- An amazing poster by one of the talented Prat sisters.
- Free popcorn!
- Free "I heart Archives" buttons!


Free popcorn. Seriously, I'm going to be sitting outside the doors at 6 with my face pressed against the glass, you just know it.
trouble: Feminists with Disabilities (fwd)
Canadians! Tell your MP to vote for C-304.

It is so rare to see any bill in parliament that acknowledges disability, let alone one that actually talks about housing needs. It would be great if we could make some noise, if we could make it clear to our Members of Parliament, our elected representatives, that we as Canadians care about accessible and affordable housing needs, so even if this bill doesn’t pass, the next time the topic comes up our MPs know: This is something that Canadians want addressed.


I have to admit, as a private member's bill being championed by the NDP, I don't think this has a dream of passing. That said, contact your MP anyway, because Canada needs a national housing strategy, and maybe if enough people talk to their MPs about it, something else will come up.
trouble: A wheelchair-using Dreamsheep with "I dream of accessibility" (I dream of accessibility)
One day, I'm going to write a post about Canada that does not make a snide comment about the government going to court to demand the right to keep their websites inaccessible to screen readers.

Some day.

Today is not that day.

Latest:

You can find the contact information for your Member of Parliament here, but be aware that, like all Government of Canada websites, this one may not be accessible to screen readers.


(One of my goals is to really make people aware of how many resources are just not available to people if they can't bloody well get on a government website. The other one is to keep that fact really clear in people's mind: The government is going to court and spending your tax payer dollars to discriminate against PWD.)

(Honestly, I don't think the government in question actually matters: The websites have been inaccessible for a very long time, pre-dating our current minority government. I don't think this is a party-related issue so much as a "What, blind people? on the internet? how stupid is that?" issue.)
trouble: "Canada is a myth people made up to entertain children, like the tooth fairy.  There's no such place." (Canada is a myth)
A friend was looking for a list of Canadian-centric blogs.

Although I lost my Big Folder of Canadian Blogs in the Google Chrome Crash of This Summer (woe), here is a short list from my feed reader. I will try and generate another list in a week or so.

Read more... )
trouble: A wheelchair-using Dreamsheep with "I dream of accessibility" (I dream of accessibility)
Dear Megan,

I recently learned of Donna Jodhan's Federal Court case, arguing that the Canadian Government must provide screen-reader accessible content on their websites, as reported in the Toronto Star (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/863379--blind-woman-says-federal-websites-discriminate-against-the-visually-impaired) and the CBC (http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/09/18/to-blind-accessible-feds.html) In light both Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and Canada's recent signing of the Declaration of Rights of Disabled Persons, I'm appalled that the Federal Government would waste tax payers' dollars in arguing that 3 million Canadians should not have the ability to access government services online or apply for government jobs online.

In this day and age, it's ridiculous for the government to argue that access to the internet is not necessary. According to the Toronto Star, government lawyers are arguing "Internet access to government services and information is not a right guaranteed in law". While I agree that this is technically true, in refusing to provide this access, the government is arguing that blind and visually impaired Canadians should have less access to government services and information than Canadians who are Sighted.

Megan, every day it is clearer to me how many societal barriers are put in place that prevent people with disabilities in Canada from full participation. The time and energy the federal government is frivolously spending in defending their lack of web accessibility could be far better put to use in bringing the government's websites up to the same standards as those in other countries, standards that are reasonable to expect in the 21st Century, or by hiring people to actually bring the websites in question up to modern accessibility standards, or even beyond.

This is such an important issue, and I hope that the NDP will work to bring awareness of it to Canadians, and encourage the federal government to stop fighting against people with disabilities, but fighting for them.

Thank you,

Anna P.
cc: Jack Layton


You know, it's really hard to try and get other people all fired up about this when I'm sort of sitting here looking at the whole thing going "Well, this is a waste of my time."

Maybe they'll impress me?
trouble: Icon showing the standard "accessibility" icons - wheelchair user, Sign, cane, and information (Accessibility)
Now that the gun registry debate is dead for another year or so, obviously all the pundits and bloggers and tweeters from the Left are going to turn their energy towards bringing national attention to the shameful government waste of going to court to argue against making websites of government services accessible to people who use screen readers or other technology, right? People on my twitter feed are going to be using that #cndpol hashtag, they're going to use the #disability #accessibility hashtags, they're going to be @pmharper even though they know he's not actually behind that twitter account... Ignattieff and Layton are going to be pulling out all the stops, on the news, in the emails, making totally accessible video content, etc, all in the name of bringing attention to this important issue, right? Right? Because we all know that accessibility is a big deal to everyone here in Canada! This isn't a political hot potato, this is a serious issue and those bits on everyone's website about how they care about Disabled Canadians are totally true, right? Right? Right?

Right?
Maybe?

no, huh?

On Tuesday, Jodhan will argue in federal court that her inability to apply for a position on the federal jobs website or complete the online version of the 2006 Census breached her equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

She will also argue that this violation and her ongoing inability to access the government’s online information and services constitute a breach against all blind and partially sighted Canadians, said Jodhan’s lawyer David Baker.
...
American and European governments have adopted the latest international web accessibility standards for their websites as have Canadian banks and many businesses, he said. But the Canadian government has not — even though the changes would not be difficult or expensive to implement, he said.


Internet access to government services and information is not a right guaranteed in law, the government says in its written submission to the court.

DID YOU KNOW: People with disabilities had to campaign heavily to have their rights guaranteed under the Charter, but those rights are there, and those rights include equal access.
trouble: Icon showing the standard "accessibility" icons - wheelchair user, Sign, cane, and information (Disability)
I've already sent this off, so my beloved grammar mavens, I have seen the comma abuse, but now it's gone and I can't take it back. Woe. :(

I actually do believe that someone at my MP's office reads my emails and they actually respond to them as though they've read them. I do get good personalized responses to the bulk of my emails. (This makes it sound like I email every week, but I email in personal stuff probably every three or four months, and slightly more often email "I support this thing you're doing, don't bother to respond.")

Hello Megan,

As you know, I'm a very passionate disability rights advocate. Today I am writing because I have repeatedly responded to the NDP emails that link to NDP videos requesting that they be transcribed and subtitled, in order to be more accessible to Canadians, both those with disabilities and those without. Unfortunately, these emails have not been responded to.

While I note that in the most recent email that went out, Jack Layton's speech at the Caucus Strategy Session does have a transcript provided (which I presume is from his prepared speech, as there are several differences between it and what is shown on the video), both the video provided with Mr Layton's Press Release about the Gun Registry (http://www.ndp.ca/press/ndp-to-pm-you-don-t-have-votes-time-to-compromise) and several of the videos on the NDP YouTube site are neither captioned nor transcribed.

I know disability and accessibility are things you care about too, Megan, so I hope that you will pass along my concerns to the NDP Leadership: Transcribing and subtitling/captioning of video and audio content is an accessibility issue. Providing both a transcript and subtitling allows for more Canadians to be able to access the message of the NDP. As well, it shows a commitment to accessibility and to including Canadians who prefer or require transcripts and subtitling, for whatever reason. As this is something I believe the NDP values, it would be helpful for the party, at all levels, to provide transcription and subtitling for all the videos that they produce.

Thank you very much for your time in reading this email.

Anna


Honestly, I have a form letter I now send off in response to every party email I get from all the National parties asking about transcriptions and/or subtitles. I have never gotten a response. I've even had specific Party members swear to me up and down they'll look into it. Never get a response. My father suggested I just skip all this and email Megan, and thus, here I am.
trouble: Sketch of Hermoine from Harry Potter with "Bookworms will rule the world (after we finish the background reading)" on it (Default)
*epic-length incoherent screaming*

OH YAY! Gentle reader, I'm here to inform you that once again Tracy Latimer's murderer is in the news, which means we can deal with another week or two or months or years of people wibbling on about how Tracy Latimer's murderer is such a sweet innocent man who only murdered his disabled daughter because Tracy wasn't really a person and deserved to be murdered, and how he's such a victim of the system, and woe is poor him, and how cripples really DO have no life and it's totally okay for people to murder disabled children, as long as they don't have a disability and murder their own non-disabled children. Those people are menaces and should be locked up forever!!!!!!!!!!!

This reminds me, once again, of who's considered to have worth in this society.

Look, to be a bit more reasonable, I do think it's reasonable that Tracy Latimer's murderer be up for parole. We have rules about that in this country, and I'm not arguing about that. What I hate is every time Tracy Latimer's murderer is mentioned in the news, the same damned thing happens. Can we just ignore him until his prison term is up, and then keep him away from all children everywhere since he obviously thinks they're disposable? (Oh, wait, only the crippled children. That's okay then.)

Tracy Latimer. She laughed, she smiled, she had friends, she went to school. And he murdered her while the family was at church, in a way we've deemed is inhumane when applied to dogs. What an innocent woobie he is.
trouble: Woman holding out her arms, "I can do anything" (I can do anything)
All women of childbearing age, and not just pregnant women, should be screened about how much alcohol they drink, new Canadian guidelines recommend.

Women's health experts from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, known as the SOGC, developed the guidelines based on a review of scientific evidence regarding possible harm to a fetus.

The guidelines, released on Thursday, aim to make alcohol screening and support for women at risk a routine part of medical visits to prevent fetal alcohol spectrum disorder or FASD.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2010/08/12/alcohol-use-pregnancy.html#ixzz0wQQL89cr


Yes, that's right, gentle readers. All cis women in Canada should be "screened about how much alcohol they drink" to prevent FASD. Aren't getting pregnant? Aren't in a sexual relationship? Aren't in a sexual relationship with a person who could cause a pregnancy? Aren't whatever? No matter! You are a womb! An incubator! A carrier of generations yet unborn! YAY!

I'm so going to have a drink tonight, in celebration of my incubator-status. You are welcome to join me.

{yes yes whatever this is irritating me all out of proportion i'm too sensitive wah wah - take it to your own space. this is my drinking to my unused uterus thread. People who do not drink for whatever reason are welcome to raise a glass of non-alcoholic beverage of their choice as well, should they wish to do so.}

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Base style:
[personal profile] timeasmymeasure
Theme:
[personal profile] forthwritten

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2013 12:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios